Lamb, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Understood resemblance and you may relationship triumph among relationship partners: An enthusiastic idiographic approach
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If I am not scorching, are you currently scorching or not?: Physical-appeal evaluations and you can relationship choices while the a function of one’s individual appeal. Mental Technology, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage or other intimate relationship. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of ambition. Within the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Personality and also the decisions disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship relationships future that have insiders’ and you will outsiders’ angle: Exactly who and you may what exactly is requested things. Individual Dating, ta en titt pГҐ webblГ¤nken 13, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship top quality during the newlyweds: A couple of based means. Record off Identification and you will Personal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A great. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Statement toward Pew Websites & American Existence Project. Retrieved , regarding [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Assessing the accuracy regarding predictions throughout the relationship matchmaking: Just how and just why do lovers’ predictions change from men and women made by perceiver? Character and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing items from the initiation off heterosexual relationship. Paper showed at Very first Globally Meeting on Individual Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, Elizabeth.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A good. (2000). Electronic relationships and you will digital appropriate: Conceptualizing computer mediated personal matchmaking. Family, forty two, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]
Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try genuine similarity necessary for attraction? An excellent meta-analysis away from real and you can sensed similarity. Record out-of Personal and personal Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Website links ]
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Relationships pleasure as a predictor of similarity analysis; An examination of the destination-resemblance theory. Record out of Societal and private Matchmaking, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Log from Societal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2007). New attraction-similarity hypothesis one of get across-sex relatives: Relationships pleasure, thought similarities, and you will self-providing attitudes. Log regarding Societal and personal Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of your SVR idea away from dyadic combining. Diary of ily, 49, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will separation: An excellent 14-12 months longitudinal study of black colored partners and you can white partners. Log of Personal and personal Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The latest like algorithm Fits thinks it has got discovered an algorithm having governing the net dating team: A scientific strategy for finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Business 2.0 Journal. Retrieved to your of [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Personality parallels into the people. Identification and you will Private Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Companion needs: What attributes carry out anyone notice within brief-label sexual and you may much time-title personal partners? Diary of Psychology and you will Individual Sexuality, several, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). This new role of thinking throughout the initiation and you may span of societal interaction. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]